Summary
Editor's rating
Value: good deal if you need a tough all-round boot
Design: old-school look, practical layout
Comfort: good once broken in, but not cloud-like
Materials: solid leather, basic sole, nothing fancy
Durability: built to last a while, but not forever
Performance: waterproofing and support are the strong points
What kind of boot this actually is
Pros
- Reliable waterproofing that actually keeps feet dry in wet grass, puddles, and slush
- Sturdy leather upper with good ankle support for uneven terrain and long shifts
- Good overall value for a durable, all-purpose work/hiking hybrid boot
Cons
- A bit heavy and bulky compared to modern lightweight hiking boots
- Stock insole is basic and often needs upgrading for best comfort
- Cemented sole means resoling is unlikely; when the tread is gone, the boot is basically done
Specifications
View full product page →| Brand | Wolverine |
| Product Dimensions | 12 x 8 x 4.5 inches; 1.69 Pounds |
| Item model number | W05103 Spencer-M |
| Department | mens |
| Date First Available | September 20, 2008 |
| Manufacturer | Wolverine |
| ASIN | B00BQW73D8 |
| Best Sellers Rank | See Top 100 in Clothing, Shoes & Jewelry |
A workhorse boot for people who actually go outside
I’ve been using the Wolverine Spencer Waterproof Hiking Boot (men’s, brown/black) as my main beater boot for a mix of stuff: weekend hikes, yard work, and some long days standing on concrete. I’m not sponsored, I paid for them, and I’m not gentle with my footwear. If something is going to fall apart or hurt my feet, it usually happens fast with me.
Out of the box, they felt like classic Wolverine: slightly stiff leather, solid build, and not super light. You can tell right away they’re more in the “work/hike hybrid” category than a modern ultra-light hiker. If you’re coming from trail runners or very light hiking shoes, the first thing you’ll notice is the extra weight and bulk. If you’re used to work boots, these will feel pretty normal, maybe even a bit lighter.
Over the first two weeks, I wore them for a couple of 6–8 km hikes, a full day doing yard work in wet grass and mud, and a long indoor day on hard floors. That gave me a decent idea of how they handle different situations: water, support, long wear, and how annoying (or not) they are to break in. I also paid attention to small things like how fast they dry, how the laces behave, and whether my feet roasted in them.
Overall, they come across as a practical, no-nonsense boot: strong leather upper, man‑made sole, waterproof lining, removable insole. Not perfect, not high-tech, but they get the basics right. In this review I’ll go through design, materials, comfort, performance, durability potential, and value, and I’ll be blunt about where they’re good and where they’re just “meh but fine.”
Value: good deal if you need a tough all-round boot
In terms of value, I’d call these good bang for the buck if you actually use your boots in rough, wet, or mixed conditions. You’re getting real leather, waterproofing that actually works, a supportive structure with a shank, and a brand with a decent track record. They’re not bargain-basement cheap, but they sit in that mid-range where you expect reliability without fancy tech.
Compared to cheaper no-name boots I’ve tried, the difference is clear: those usually feel comfy for a month and then either the sole starts peeling or the waterproofing gives up. The Spencer feels more solid from day one. Compared to higher-end hiking brands with premium soles and more advanced cushioning, you’re obviously giving up some refinement and maybe some long-distance comfort, but you’re also paying less. For someone who needs one boot for hiking, chores, and bad weather, this middle ground makes sense.
The Amazon rating around 4.3/5 lines up with how I feel: mostly positive, with a few quirks. You probably will want to budget a bit extra for a better insole, which I think this boot deserves. Once you factor that in, it’s still a fair deal. If you’re only doing casual, dry-weather walks around town, this is overkill and you could save money with something lighter. But if your days often involve mud, snow, wet grass, or long hours on your feet, the extra durability and waterproofing justify the price.
So, value-wise: good, not mind-blowing. It’s a solid, reliable boot at a fair price point. There are better boots if you’re ready to spend a lot more, and there are cheaper ones that won’t last as long. This sits in a comfortable middle where you get what you pay for, and maybe a bit more in terms of lifespan and toughness.
Design: old-school look, practical layout
Design-wise, the Spencer is pretty straightforward. Brown/black color, classic hiking boot silhouette, nothing flashy. If you like boots that don’t scream for attention, this is fine. The leather has a slightly matte finish that hides scuffs decently. After a couple of muddy hikes and banging them against rocks and pallets, they picked up some marks, but nothing that made them look wrecked. Wipe them down and they still look presentable.
The lacing system is simple but functional. Lower eyelets are standard holes, upper ones are speed hooks. You can really crank down on the mid-foot if you want a locked-in feel, and then fine-tune the tension around the ankle. I like that for uneven terrain; you can keep the ankle snug while giving your toes some room. The tongue is gusseted high enough that water and debris don’t get in easily, which matters if you’re slogging through wet grass or shallow streams.
The sole pattern is medium-aggressive: enough lugs to grab dirt and light mud, but not so crazy that you’re tracking half the trail into your house. On wet rock, they’re okay but not great – pretty much what I expect from a generic man-made sole. On packed dirt, gravel, and snow, grip has been solid. They’re a bit on the chunky side visually, especially compared to modern hikers, but they look right at home with jeans or work pants.
One thing I’ll say: if you want a boot that looks ultra modern or city-stylish, this isn’t it. It’s more “guy who actually shovels his own driveway” than “Instagram hiking outfit.” That’s fine by me, but worth knowing. In terms of pure practicality, the design choices – height, tongue, hooks, toe protection – make sense for real use.
Comfort: good once broken in, but not cloud-like
Out of the box, the comfort was okay but a bit stiff. Not painful, just clearly a leather boot that needs some time. For me, the break-in period was roughly a couple of days of casual wear plus one longer day (around 10 hours total) on my feet. After that, the flex at the forefoot felt more natural and the collar stopped rubbing at all. One Amazon reviewer said about 12 hours of wear for them; that lines up pretty well with my experience.
In terms of fit, they run slightly on the roomy side. I’m between sizes in some brands, and in these I had extra space with thin socks. With thicker hiking or work socks, the fit felt more secure. If you like a snug performance fit, you may notice a bit of extra volume, especially over the top of the foot. The removable insole is also on the thinner, softer side, so if you drop in a more supportive insole, it fills that space nicely and makes the boot feel more dialed.
Standing and walking comfort is where they do pretty well for the category. I used them for an 8–9 hour day on concrete and packed dirt, and my feet were tired but not wrecked. The cushioning is decent but not special – this isn’t a running shoe – but the combination of midsole, insole, and shank gives enough support that you’re not feeling every rock or crack. Compared to a cheap no-name work boot, these are much better. Compared to high-end hiking boots with fancy midsoles, these feel more basic.
Heat and sweat-wise, they’re acceptable for a waterproof boot. My feet got warm, especially in a heated indoor environment, but not soaked. The mesh lining helps a bit, and the fact that they “breathe” better than some heavy work boots is noticeable. Still, if you run hot and spend all day indoors, you’ll feel the warmth. Overall, comfort is solid for the price, as long as you give them a break-in period and ideally upgrade the insole if you’re picky.
Materials: solid leather, basic sole, nothing fancy
The upper is listed as 100% leather, and it feels like medium-thickness, fairly tough stuff. Not super soft out of the box, but not cardboard either. After a few days of bending and flexing, it started to loosen up without feeling flimsy. I’ve scraped them on rocks, branches, and the usual garage junk, and the leather holds up decently. You’ll get creases and light scuffs, but nothing catastrophic. A bit of conditioner wouldn’t hurt if you want them to age better.
Inside, you’ve got mesh linings that are supposed to manage moisture. In practice, they do an okay job. My feet still get warm on long days – these are waterproof boots after all – but I didn’t feel like I was standing in a swamp. With decent socks, sweat buildup stays manageable. The nylon shank adds some stiffness under the arch, so the boot doesn’t fold in half when you step on a rock edge or ladder rung. That’s more of a work-boot style feature, and it’s useful if you’re on uneven ground a lot.
The sole is man-made rubber-like material, with Wolverine’s cemented construction. That means the sole is glued/bonded, not stitched like a Goodyear welt. At this price, that’s normal. It also means resoling is less realistic; when the sole is done, the boot is pretty much done. The compound feels medium-firm: not super squishy like some sneakers, but not hard plastic either. On asphalt and concrete, it’s fine, though you don’t get that high-end rubber feel you’d get from pricier hiking brands.
The removable full-cushion insole is serviceable but basic. It’s soft enough for short use, but if you have picky feet or plan on long shifts, I’d seriously consider swapping it for a better aftermarket insole. One Amazon reviewer mentioned you basically “need” insoles, and I agree that upgrading them makes the boot feel more dialed in. Materials overall are what I’d call mid-range: tough enough, no luxury, but good for the money.
Durability: built to last a while, but not forever
I haven’t had these for years yet, but I can comment on early signs and look at what other users report. One Amazon review mentioned 2.5 years of use (mostly indoors) and the boots were still comfortable, sturdy, and looking good. That sounds realistic for this kind of construction and materials, especially if you’re not abusing them on construction sites every day.
From my own use, the leather is holding up well to scuffs and flexing. No cracking, no weird creases that look like they’ll split. The stitching around the upper and along the lacing area looks clean and hasn’t frayed. The sole bond (cemented construction) shows no signs of separation so far, even after getting soaked and then drying a few times. That’s usually where cheap boots start to fail, and I don’t see early warning signs yet.
The downside is that because this is a cemented sole, you’re basically done when the tread wears out or if the sole starts to peel badly. It’s not meant to be easily resoled like a Goodyear welt boot. For the price point and the type of user this is aimed at, that’s not shocking. I’d expect, with mixed use (hiking, chores, some work), to get at least a couple of solid seasons, and more if you’re mostly indoors or on mild terrain.
If you take basic care – clean mud off, let them dry naturally away from direct heat, maybe condition the leather once in a while – they should hold up well. If you absolutely trash your boots daily in harsh conditions, you’ll eventually chew through the sole faster. Overall, I’d rate durability as pretty solid for the money: not indestructible, but better than cheap big-box boots and in line with Wolverine’s reputation.
Performance: waterproofing and support are the strong points
For actual use, these boots do what they claim. Waterproofing has been reliable so far. I’ve walked through wet grass, shallow puddles, slushy snow, and muddy trails, and my feet stayed dry. Another user mentioned bogs, creeks, and even climbing around a waterfall with no leaks, and I can believe that. As long as the water stays below the top of the boot and you don’t let it pour in from above, you’re good. I also like that the tongue is high and gusseted, which helps a lot with splash and debris.
Traction is decent on dirt, gravel, and light mud. In thicker mud, they’ll still cake up like any boot without a super aggressive sole, but that’s normal. On wet rock and smooth surfaces, grip is average. I had a couple of small slips on wet stone, but nothing crazy – just don’t expect mountaineering-level grip. On snow, especially packed snow, they hold fine, and they take ice chains/traction devices without an issue, which one Amazon reviewer also pointed out.
Ankle support is actually one of the better aspects. The collar height and stiffness mean that when you step sideways on a rock or root, the boot keeps your ankle from rolling too far. I had a few moments where, in sneakers, I would have twisted something, but in these I just felt the boot take the hit. For long work shifts or rough trails, that gives some peace of mind. They’re also padded enough around the ankle that I didn’t get hot spots once broken in.
Where they’re less impressive is in pure light-hiking performance compared to more modern boots: they’re heavier and less nimble. If you like fast, light hikes, you’ll probably feel them as a bit clunky. But if your priority is a tough, waterproof boot that you can wear for shoveling snow, doing chores, and then hitting a short hike, they perform well. They’re more of a “do everything pretty well” boot than a specialist in one niche.
What kind of boot this actually is
The Wolverine Spencer is basically a mid-height leather hiking boot that leans a bit toward a work boot. It’s not a sleek mountain boot and it’s not a sporty trail runner. Think of it as a sturdy all-rounder for people who want one boot they can trash in different situations: hiking, light work, bad weather commuting, that kind of thing.
The upper is 100% leather with some textile panels, and it has a waterproof membrane plus moisture-managing mesh lining. The sole is man-made (so no fancy Vibram branding here), and the construction is cemented – which is pretty standard at this price. You get a nylon shank for some underfoot support and a removable full-cushion insole. The pair in size 10 is around the 1.6–1.8 lb range, so not ultra light but not a tank either.
On the foot, they sit just above the ankle bone, so you get decent ankle support without feeling like you’re in a tall work boot. The lacing system uses standard eyelets at the bottom and hooks at the top, so it’s easy to cinch them tight and then loosen quickly. They don’t feel like mountaineering boots, more like something you’d keep in your car or by the door for any job that might get wet or rough.
If you’re expecting a modern technical hiker with aggressive rocker and super grippy, branded rubber, this isn’t it. If you want a basic, sturdy, waterproof leather boot that can handle mud, snow shoveling, light hunting, and long standing shifts, that’s where this model makes more sense. It’s very much a practical, blue-collar style boot, not a fashion piece.
Pros
- Reliable waterproofing that actually keeps feet dry in wet grass, puddles, and slush
- Sturdy leather upper with good ankle support for uneven terrain and long shifts
- Good overall value for a durable, all-purpose work/hiking hybrid boot
Cons
- A bit heavy and bulky compared to modern lightweight hiking boots
- Stock insole is basic and often needs upgrading for best comfort
- Cemented sole means resoling is unlikely; when the tread is gone, the boot is basically done
Conclusion
Editor's rating
The Wolverine Spencer Waterproof Hiking Boot is a practical, no-nonsense choice if you want one boot that can handle bad weather, rough ground, and long days on your feet. It’s not light, it’s not flashy, and it doesn’t have fancy brand-name soles, but it does the basics well: it keeps your feet dry, gives decent ankle support, and feels sturdy enough to take abuse. After break-in, comfort is solid, especially if you drop in a better insole, and the leather feels like it’ll handle a few seasons of real use.
Who is this for? People who shovel snow, do yard work, hike on weekends, or stand on hard floors for hours, and want one boot that can cover all that without falling apart. If your idea of “hiking” is more like walking around a mall, this is overkill. If you’re doing technical mountain stuff or ultra-long backpacking trips, there are more specialized boots that will serve you better. But for the average person who needs a tough, waterproof daily beater, the Spencer offers good value and dependable performance.
If you’re okay with a bit of weight, a short break-in period, and the idea that these are more workhorse than showpiece, you’ll probably be happy with them. If you want ultra-light, super soft, or very stylish, I’d look elsewhere. For me, they land at a solid 4/5: good boot, fair price, a few small compromises, but overall they get the job done well.