Summary
Editor's rating
Value: fair price if you use them hard
Design: wide, rugged, and a bit old-school
Comfort: wide and supportive, but not a slipper
Materials: tough leather, legit waterproofing, decent breathability
Durability: built to take abuse, time will tell on the membrane
Trail performance and everyday use
What you actually get with the Targhee 3 Low
Pros
- Wide toe box and good arch support make them comfortable for wider feet and weak arches
- Durable leather upper with strong toe protection and solid outsole grip on mud and rocks
- Waterproof membrane that actually keeps feet dry in wet grass and shallow puddles
Cons
- Run a bit warm due to leather and waterproof membrane, not ideal for hot climates
- Laces are on the short side, making secure double-knotting tricky
- Feel firmer and heavier than lightweight trail runners, which some people may not like
Specifications
View full product page β| Brand | KEEN |
| Product Dimensions | 10 x 15 x 6 inches |
| Item model number | 1023027 |
| Department | mens |
| Date First Available | April 1, 2023 |
| Manufacturer | KEEN |
| ASIN | B0CGZCD289 |
| Best Sellers Rank | See Top 100 in Clothing, Shoes & Jewelry |
Trail shoes I can actually wear all day
Iβve been using the KEEN Menβs Targhee 3 Low Height Waterproof Hiking Shoes (size 11, Bungee Cord/Black) as my main pair for about three weeks now. Iβve worn them on actual hikes, walking the dog on wet sidewalks, and just as everyday shoes for errands. So this isnβt a lab test; itβs just how they behave in real life when you stop babying them. Short version: theyβre solid, especially if you have wider feet, but theyβre not perfect.
The first thing I noticed when I put them on was the fit around the toes. KEENβs wider shape is real β my toes finally had room to move instead of being squeezed like in most "sporty" shoes. I didnβt get that instant wow feeling, but after a full day on my feet, I realized I wasnβt thinking about my shoes, which is usually a good sign. They just quietly did their job.
I used them on two decent hikes: one rocky, dry trail of about 8 km, and another muddy walk after a full night of rain. They handled both without me slipping around or feeling every rock through the sole. They feel more like sturdy trail shoes than light runners. If youβre coming from a soft sneaker, theyβll feel a bit heavier and more rigid at first, but thatβs kind of the point with this type of shoe.
Overall, my first impression is: practical, built to last, not flashy. Theyβre the kind of shoe you grab when you donβt want to think too much: wet day, mixed terrain, weekend trip, whatever. There are a couple of annoyances, like the laces and the break-in feel, but nothing that kills the deal. Just donβt expect them to feel like running shoes out of the box.
Value: fair price if you use them hard
In terms of value, these KEEN Targhee 3 Low shoes sit in that mid-to-upper price range for hiking shoes. Theyβre not budget, but theyβre not the most expensive either. For the money, youβre getting real leather, a waterproof membrane, solid support, and a design that can double as an everyday shoe. If youβre the kind of person who will actually hike, walk a lot, and wear them in bad weather, the cost makes sense because they feel like theyβll last more than one season.
Compared to cheaper hiking shoes Iβve tried, the main differences are: better toe room, more stable support, and a more durable feel in the leather and outsole. Cheaper pairs often start peeling, cracking, or losing grip pretty fast. Here, it feels like youβre paying for longevity and comfort for wider feet. If you have narrow feet and never had issues with cheap shoes, you might not see the point in paying extra for these.
On the flip side, if youβre mostly walking on city streets or doing very light trails a couple of times a year, these might be overkill. You could get a non-waterproof trail runner or a lighter hiking shoe for less money and be perfectly happy. Where the Targhee 3 really earns its price is for people who want one pair that can handle: rain, mud, rocks, and daily wear without falling apart. The Amazon rating around 4.3/5 lines up with my feeling: very good overall, with a few quirks like short laces and some warmth in hot weather.
So, value-wise, Iβd say theyβre a good buy if you need durability, waterproofing, and a wide fit. If youβre just chasing the lowest price, youβll find cheaper options. If you want something more technical and lighter for fast hiking or trail running, youβll find more specialized shoes too. These sit in the middle: solid, dependable workhorses for regular outdoor use.
Design: wide, rugged, and a bit old-school
The design is very much function first, style second, but in a good way. The toe box is noticeably wide β KEENβs βOriginal Fitβ is not marketing talk, you can see the difference just by looking at it next to a more narrow hiking shoe. The toe area is also heavily protected with a thick rubber cap. Thatβs not the prettiest thing, but when you slam your toes into a rock or a root, youβre glad itβs there. I did that a couple of times and felt pressure but no pain, so the protection works.
The upper combines leather panels with mesh sections. The leather gives structure and durability, while the mesh areas help a bit with breathability. The color blocking on the Bungee Cord/Black version is low key: mostly earthy brown with dark grey/black overlays. Itβs the kind of design that hides dirt and mud well. After a muddy walk, once the mud dried and I brushed it off, they looked almost new aside from a few small creases in the leather.
The lacing system is pretty standard: fabric loops and a couple of stronger eyelets near the top. Nothing fancy like BOA or weird hooks, but it works. My gripe is with the lace length: for my size 11, the laces feel a bit too short if I want to tighten them properly and still have room for a good double knot. One Amazon user even reused old laces because of that, and I understand why. Itβs not a dealbreaker, but for this price range, slightly longer laces would be a simple fix.
Underneath, the outsole has 4 mm multi-directional lugs that are pretty aggressive without being ridiculous. You can walk on pavement without feeling like youβre wearing soccer cleats, but you still get grip in mud and on rocks. The sole is also non-marking, which I tested on indoor floors β no black streaks in the hallway, which is nice if you wear them indoors sometimes. Design-wise, these shoes are clearly built to take abuse, not to win style contests, and for a hiking shoe, that makes sense.
Comfort: wide and supportive, but not a slipper
Comfort-wise, these are very friendly to wider feet and weak arches, but theyβre not cloud-soft. The first two days, I could feel that the midsole was firmer than my usual casual sneakers. Not painful, just more structured. After a few walks, the shoe softened a bit and my foot got used to the support. The key thing is the toe box: my toes finally had room to spread out. If youβre used to narrow trail shoes, this will feel like a relief. I didnβt get any blisters, even on a first 6 km hike, which surprised me.
The arch support is clearly better than in regular sneakers. One Amazon reviewer mentioned having weak arches and liking these, and I can back that up. I normally start feeling arch fatigue after a long day in flat shoes. In these, I did a full day (shopping, walking, stairs) and my arches felt fine. The external support shank and the heel cradle do their job: your foot feels locked in, especially around the midfoot and heel, while the toe area can move. If you like a very loose, flexible feel, you might find them too structured, but if you want support, they deliver.
Underfoot cushioning is on the firmer side but with decent rebound. It doesnβt pack down quickly. After several longer walks, they still feel the same. Iβd say they are comfortable in a practical way: your feet feel supported and protected, not pampered. For me, thatβs better on rocky trails β I donβt want to feel every little stone. On the downside, if you do mostly city walking and want a super soft ride, these might feel a bit overbuilt.
One small negative: because theyβre waterproof and leather-heavy, they run a bit warm. On a hot day, my feet wanted to get out of them once I got home. On cooler or rainy days, theyβre perfect. So comfort is great for support and width, decent for all-day wear, but just okay for hot-weather breathability. If your priority is foot support and toe room, these are a strong option. If your priority is a light, airy shoe, look elsewhere.
Materials: tough leather, legit waterproofing, decent breathability
The upper is 100% leather combined with breathable mesh, plus KEENβs KEEN.DRY waterproof membrane inside. The leather feels thick and sturdy, not thin and plasticky like some cheap βleatherβ shoes. After a few hikes and some kneeling in the yard, I donβt see any peeling or cracking. There are some creases where the foot bends, which is normal. The mesh inserts donβt look fragile either; they havenβt snagged or frayed yet, even after brushing off dried mud with a stiff brush.
Waterproofing actually holds up. I walked through wet grass and some shallow puddles where water came up to just below the laces. My socks stayed dry the whole time. The membrane seems solid: it lets some moisture out but not like a super-breathable trail runner. On cool to mild days, my feet felt fine. On a warmer day (around 24Β°C) doing a long walk on pavement, my feet got warm and a bit sweaty, but not soaked. So breathability is okay for a leather waterproof shoe, but if you run hot or hike in very warm climates, youβll notice the heat build-up.
The lining is quick-dry fabric. After getting some sweat in them one day, I left the insoles out overnight and by the next morning, both shoes and insoles were dry enough to wear again. The insole itself is removable and has some arch support built in. Itβs not the most high-tech insole ever, but itβs better than the flat ones you get in cheap sneakers. If you use custom orthotics, you can pull the stock insole out easily and drop yours in.
KEEN also mentions Eco Anti-Odor (a probiotic-based treatment) and leather from Leather Working Groupβcertified tanneries. In real life, what that means is: after a few sweaty uses, the shoes donβt stink yet. I canβt say how that holds up in six months, but so far theyβre fine. Overall, the materials feel like theyβre built to be used hard: thick leather, strong stitching, and a sole that doesnβt feel like itβs going to peel off after one season.
Durability: built to take abuse, time will tell on the membrane
Durability is where these shoes feel reassuring. The leather upper is thick and doesnβt show much wear after a few weeks of regular use and a couple of dirty hikes. Iβve scraped them against rocks and branches, and the leather just has minor marks that you can mostly brush off or condition later. The rubber toe guard is tough β Iβve hit it on rocks more than once and it hasnβt peeled or separated from the leather at all.
The outsole shows very little wear so far. The lugs still look sharp, and thereβs no rounding off at the heel yet, even though Iβve worn them on pavement a fair bit. Thatβs usually where cheaper soles start to go first. The stitching all around the shoe looks clean and solid. I checked the joins between the upper and the sole, and thereβs no sign of separation or bubbling. One Amazon reviewer mentioned having several pairs last many years, and based on how these feel in hand, I can see why.
The only long-term unknown is the waterproof membrane. All membranes eventually lose some performance over time, especially if you flex them a lot and donβt care for the leather. Right now, theyβre fully waterproof in puddles and wet grass. To keep that going, youβll want to clean off mud, let them dry away from direct heat, and occasionally use a leather cleaner/conditioner or DWR spray, like KEEN suggests. If you treat them like cheap sneakers and throw them in a corner wet, donβt expect miracles in two years.
Overall, these feel like shoes that can handle several seasons of weekend hikes plus daily abuse. Theyβre not fragile, and nothing about them feels "on the edge" of breaking. If something does annoy me long-term, I suspect it would be the laces wearing out first, or the inside heel lining eventually rubbing through, which happens with most shoes. But in terms of build, they seem pretty solid for the price bracket, especially compared to lighter, more "fast" hiking shoes that often die quicker.
Trail performance and everyday use
On the trail, the traction is the standout. The KEEN ALL-TERRAIN rubber with 4 mm lugs grips well in mud and on rocks. On a wet, muddy path, I didnβt feel like I was skating around, and going downhill felt controlled. On rocky sections, the lugs and the bruise plate did their job: I could step on sharp rocks without feeling a painful pressure point under my foot. That bruise plate is one of those things you donβt think about until you donβt have it. Here, itβs clearly there, and it helps.
On wet pavement and smooth surfaces, theyβre also solid. I walked through wet city streets and polished tiles in a store, and I didnβt feel them slipping. The soles are non-marking, and I tested that on indoor floors β no black lines. So you can wear them inside without annoying anyone. Theyβre not running shoes though: the flex is moderate, not super bendy, so while you can walk fast in them, theyβre not ideal if you plan to jog.
Waterproof performance has been good so far. I intentionally stepped into puddles and walked through soaked grass for about 15β20 minutes. My socks stayed dry. The only way youβd get wet is if water goes over the top or if you stand in deep water for a long time. The KEEN.DRY membrane seems to be working as advertised. Of course, like all waterproof shoes, if you sweat a lot inside, some moisture will stay in, but thatβs normal.
For everyday use, they act like supportive, tough sneakers. Iβve worn them to run errands, stand around for a couple of hours, and walk the dog. Theyβre comfortable enough for daily use, but you feel that theyβre built for more than just city walking. If you do a mix of trail and urban, these make sense. If you only walk on flat sidewalks and never see dirt, they might be overkill, and youβd probably be happier in something lighter and cheaper.
What you actually get with the Targhee 3 Low
On paper, the KEEN Targhee 3 Low is sold as a waterproof hiking shoe with a leather upper, KEEN.DRY membrane, and a wider fit. In practice, it feels like a halfway point between a classic leather hiking boot and a beefy sneaker. Each shoe is around 500 g, so not ultra-light, but you can still wear them all day without feeling like youβve got bricks on your feet. If youβre used to minimal shoes, these will feel bulky; if youβre used to older hiking boots, these will feel reasonably light.
The Bungee Cord/Black color is pretty neutral. Itβs basically brownish with black accents and some subtle details. It goes fine with jeans, hiking pants, even casual chinos. Nothing flashy, nothing that screams βI just came down from Everestβ when you walk into a store. Thatβs good if you want one pair that works for workdays and weekends. Several Amazon reviewers mentioned liking the look and calling them sturdy and good-looking, and Iβd agree β they look like proper outdoor shoes without being loud.
Out of the box, mine had no glue marks, no bad stitching, and no weird chemical smell. The laces, though, felt a bit short for my taste, especially if you like to really lock your foot in. One Amazon review called that out too, and I get it. I can tie them, but I donβt have a lot of extra lace to double-knot. On a long hike, thatβs a bit annoying because I like a secure knot so Iβm not stopping all the time.
So overall, what you get is a robust, waterproof low-cut hiking shoe that looks decent enough for daily use, with a clear focus on durability and support rather than being super light or ultra-breathable. Itβs not flashy tech, but the basics are there: solid leather, thick sole, reinforced toe, and a shape that actually respects wider feet. For most people who just want a reliable outdoor shoe, this is exactly the kind of package that makes sense.
Pros
- Wide toe box and good arch support make them comfortable for wider feet and weak arches
- Durable leather upper with strong toe protection and solid outsole grip on mud and rocks
- Waterproof membrane that actually keeps feet dry in wet grass and shallow puddles
Cons
- Run a bit warm due to leather and waterproof membrane, not ideal for hot climates
- Laces are on the short side, making secure double-knotting tricky
- Feel firmer and heavier than lightweight trail runners, which some people may not like
Conclusion
Editor's rating
The KEEN Menβs Targhee 3 Low Height Waterproof Hiking Shoes are reliable, wide, and built to work, not to impress on Instagram. The main strengths are the roomy toe box, solid arch and heel support, and real waterproofing that actually keeps your feet dry in puddles and wet grass. The leather feels tough, the outsole grips well on mud and rocks, and overall they give you that βI can step anywhere and not worryβ feeling. If you have wider feet or weak arches, these make a lot of sense as both trail shoes and everyday beaters.
Theyβre not perfect though. They run a bit warm because of the waterproof membrane and leather, so theyβre not ideal for hot climates or people who run very hot. The laces are on the short side, which is annoying if you like a double knot. And if youβre used to light, flexible running-style shoes, the firmer, more structured feel will take some getting used to. Theyβre more about stability and protection than about being ultra-light and airy.
Iβd recommend these to hikers, dog walkers, and anyone who spends a lot of time on their feet outdoors in mixed weather and wants one pair that can handle most situations. Theyβre also a good choice if youβve struggled with narrow hiking shoes crushing your toes. If you mainly walk on flat city sidewalks, rarely see mud, or want something super light for fast hiking or trail running, Iβd look at other models. But if you want a tough, comfortable, waterproof low-cut hiker with extra toe room, the Targhee 3 Low is a pretty solid option.