Berghaus Hillmaster II GTX Review: solid leather boots for wet British hikes

Berghaus Hillmaster II GTX Review: solid leather boots for wet British hikes

Riley Kingston
Riley Kingston
Trail Storyteller
20 June 2026 1 min read

Summary

Editor's rating

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Value: fair price if you need real waterproof leather boots

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Design: traditional look, practical choices

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Comfort: good out of the box, but warm and a bit heavy

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Materials: leather, Gore‑Tex and a chunky sole

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Durability: tough outside, mixed feelings inside

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Performance on the trail: wet weather is where they shine

★★★★★ ★★★★★

What you actually get with the Hillmaster II GTX

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Pros

  • Very good waterproofing in real wet, muddy conditions
  • Comfortable almost straight out of the box with decent support
  • Solid leather upper and grippy sole that handle rough terrain well

Cons

  • On the heavy and warm side compared to modern fabric boots
  • Inner lining can wear out faster with heavy daily use
Brand Berghaus

Old‑school leather boots that actually keep your feet dry

I’ve been using the Berghaus Hillmaster II GTX in size 11 UK (Coffee Brown) for wet walks, dog duty and a couple of long days out on muddy trails. If you’re used to modern mesh hiking shoes, these feel a bit like going back to a classic: full leather, Gore‑Tex, and a chunky Vibram-style sole. They’re not flashy, but that’s not really the point here.

In practice, these boots are built for typical British misery: boggy fields, wet rocks, cold wind, and the odd stream crossing you didn’t plan. I’ve had them in ankle‑deep mud, soaked fields, and long grass after heavy rain. My socks stayed dry every time, which is basically what I care about first with this kind of boot.

What surprised me most is they were pretty comfortable straight out of the box. I was expecting a proper break‑in period with hot spots and plasters, but I did a 6–7 km walk on day one and they were fine. A bit stiff around the ankle at first, but no blisters, no serious rubbing. That’s not always the case with full leather boots.

They’re not perfect though. They’re on the heavy side compared to fabric boots, they can get warm, and the inner lining doesn’t feel bombproof based on my use and what I’ve seen in other reviews. But if you mainly want a tough, waterproof leather boot for wet conditions rather than lightweight summer hikes, they do the job pretty well.

Value: fair price if you need real waterproof leather boots

★★★★★ ★★★★★

In terms of value, I’d say these sit in the “good but not mind‑blowing” category. They’re not cheap, but they’re also not at the top end of leather hiking boots. For the money, you’re getting: full leather upper, Gore‑Tex membrane, and a Vibram/EVA sole, plus a boot that arrives comfortable enough to use straight away with minimal break‑in. That’s already better than some cheaper boots I’ve tried that shredded my heels for two weeks.

Where the value is strongest is if you actually walk a lot in wet, muddy conditions. If you’re out with the dog every day in fields, or you hike regularly in the Peak District, Lakes, Wales, etc., then you’ll probably get your money’s worth from the waterproofing and support. They’re also versatile enough to wear for general winter use, not just proper hiking trips.

On the other hand, if most of your walking is on dry paths or you mainly go out in summer, they’re probably overkill. A lighter, cheaper fabric boot or even decent trail shoes might make more sense. Also, if you know you’re hard on boots and wear through linings quickly, you might feel slightly short‑changed if the inside starts to go after less than a year of daily abuse. That’s the main thing that holds the value back from being top tier for me.

Overall, I’d call the value pretty solid if you specifically want a classic leather, waterproof boot and you’re willing to look after them. If you just want something light for casual walks, there are better options for less money.

81xZEZvdKFL._AC_SL1500_

Design: traditional look, practical choices

★★★★★ ★★★★★

The design is very old‑school: full leather upper, simple stitching, and metal eyelets with proper hooks at the top for the laces. The Coffee Brown colour is quite plain, which I actually like. It doesn’t scream “technical gear”, it just looks like a normal walking boot that you can wear in town without looking like you’re off to Everest. The toe is closed and fairly rounded, with enough volume for thicker socks.

Functionally, the design is geared towards support and stability rather than being light and sporty. There’s a decent heel counter that keeps your heel locked in, and the ankle support is quite firm, especially in the first few walks. You feel supported when side‑hilling or walking on rocky paths. The sole is flat‑ish in terms of heel drop, so you don’t feel like you’re walking in high heels, which is nice for longer days.

The lacing system works fine, but I did notice – and other users mention this too – that the laces tend to loosen over time if you don’t double knot them. After about an hour, I usually have to stop once and re‑tighten, especially at the top hooks. That’s not a deal‑breaker, but it’s a bit annoying and worth knowing. Swapping to grippier laces might help.

Overall, the design is practical: good ankle coverage, high enough rand to shrug off mud, and a tread pattern that clears dirt fairly well. It’s not stylish in any special way, but if your priority is a boot that looks normal, covers the ankle, and doesn’t have weird angles or plastic bits everywhere, this design makes sense.

Comfort: good out of the box, but warm and a bit heavy

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Comfort was better than I expected for a leather boot. I wore them straight out of the box on a 6–7 km mixed walk (pavement, muddy fields, a bit of rocky trail) and didn’t get any blisters. The memory foam in the collar and tongue actually does something – it hugs the ankle nicely and stops the boot digging in. There was a slight stiff feeling at the front of the ankle for the first two outings, but it eased quickly.

The fit for me in size 11 UK is true to size with medium hiking socks. My feet are slightly wide, and I still had room without feeling squeezed. A couple of reviewers mentioned bunions and wide feet being fine in these, and I’d agree: the forefoot isn’t super narrow like some European brands. There’s also enough toe room for downhill sections so your toes aren’t slamming into the front every step.

On the downside, these are not light. After a few hours, you feel the weight more than with a fabric boot. If you’re used to trail runners, you’ll definitely notice the difference. Also, because they’re leather with Gore‑Tex, they run warm. In cool, wet weather, that’s actually nice. But on milder days or if you’re working hard uphill, your feet can get sweaty. The breathability is fine for a waterproof leather boot, but there are more breathable options if that’s your top priority.

Underfoot, cushioning is firm but comfortable. I’ve done 10–12 km days without my feet feeling battered. If you want a softer feel, you can swap the insole for something more padded, but I didn’t feel forced to. Overall, comfort is a strong point as long as you accept the weight and warmth that come with this boot style.

81xhB7PHDTL._AC_SL1500_

Materials: leather, Gore‑Tex and a chunky sole

★★★★★ ★★★★★

The upper is mainly leather, which gives the boot its slightly heavy but solid feel. It’s not super soft out of the box, but it’s not like those rock‑hard mountaineering boots either. After a few walks and a bit of wax, it softens up enough without losing structure. The lining is synthetic with a Gore‑Tex Performance Comfort membrane, which is there to keep water out but let sweat escape. In typical cool, wet UK weather, that combo works quite well.

The midsole is EVA (Ethylene Vinyl Acetate), which is pretty standard for cushioning. It feels firm but not dead – you get some shock absorption on harder surfaces without feeling like you’re bouncing. The outsole is a Vibram design with decent lugs. On wet rock and muddy fields, grip has been good for me. I wouldn’t run in them, but for steady hiking and dog walks, they bite into the ground properly and don’t feel slippy.

One thing to flag is the inner lining durability. After several months of use, I started to notice some wear around the heel area where my socks rub, and I’ve seen other users report the lining failing after around half a year of daily use. That doesn’t mean every pair will do that, but it’s a known weak point. The leather on the outside, on the other hand, holds up well as long as you clean and wax it.

Overall, the materials feel decent for the price bracket: proper leather, known membrane, and a trusted sole brand. Not top‑tier mountaineering level, but for regular hiking and wet weather use, they’re more than enough if you look after them. Just keep an eye on the inner lining if you’re planning to hammer them every day.

Durability: tough outside, mixed feelings inside

★★★★★ ★★★★★

From the outside, durability looks good. The leather has held up well for me with regular cleaning and waxing. No cracking so far, no stitching coming loose, and the sole is wearing at a normal rate. I’ve used them a fair bit on rough paths, gravel tracks, and muddy fields, and they still look like they have plenty of life left. The outsole lugs haven’t rounded off quickly, which is a good sign.

Where things get a bit more mixed is the inner lining and footbed area. After several months of fairly regular use, I started to see some wear in the heel lining where my socks rub. It’s not completely gone, but it’s clearly thinning. I’ve also seen other users mention the inner lining failing after about seven months of daily dog walking and field work. So if you’re planning to use these every single day as work boots, you might run into that sooner than you’d like.

The Gore‑Tex membrane itself hasn’t leaked for me yet, and most reviews back that up over the first year or two. As always with waterproof boots, once the lining or membrane goes, waterproofing usually goes with it. That’s why taking care of the leather (cleaning mud off, re‑waxing) matters – it helps protect everything underneath and stops water sitting in the creases.

In short, the outer durability is pretty solid for the price, but the inside could be better if you’re really hammering them. For regular hikers and weekend users, I’d expect a good few seasons out of them. For heavy daily abuse in fields and farms, I’d say they’ll last, but you may see the lining go earlier than you’d hope.

81eonSIr4rL._AC_SL1500_

Performance on the trail: wet weather is where they shine

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Performance‑wise, these boots are clearly built for wet and mixed terrain. In mud, wet grass, and sloppy fields, they’ve done very well. The tread clears mud reasonably fast, and the grip on wet rock and slick paths is pretty solid. I never had that sketchy “I’m about to go on my backside” feeling, even on greasy limestone steps. They’re not ice boots, obviously, but on light frost and compacted snow they felt secure enough for normal walking.

Waterproofing has been reliable. I’ve had them in 4–5 inch deep puddles for 20–30 metres, walked through soaked heather, and stood in wet fields for ages throwing balls for the dog. My socks stayed bone dry every time. The combination of the leather upper and Gore‑Tex membrane does its job, as long as you keep the leather waxed and don’t let it crack. Once leather cracks, water always finds a way in, no matter the membrane.

Stability is good. The heel support and midsole stiffness give you confidence on uneven ground. Side‑hilling, stepping on rocks, or walking over tree roots feels controlled. There’s enough flex in the forefoot to walk naturally, but not so much that you feel every stone. For day hikes up to 15–20 km with a normal daypack, they’re more than capable. For heavy backpacking with big loads, they’re okay, but I’d maybe want something slightly stiffer if I was doing that regularly.

The only real performance negatives are the weight over longer distances and the potential inner lining wear if you use them hard every day. For weekend hikes, dog walking, and regular countryside use, they perform well. If you’re doing multi‑day high‑mileage treks all the time, you might want something lighter or more breathable.

What you actually get with the Hillmaster II GTX

★★★★★ ★★★★★

The Hillmaster II GTX is a fairly classic mid‑to‑high hiking boot: leather upper, Gore‑Tex membrane, and a chunky rubber outsole (Vibram-branded midsole/EVA combo). Mine are the Coffee Brown colour, which just looks like a standard dark brown walking boot – nothing fancy. Shaft height is around the ankle, so it’s a proper boot, not a shoe, but it doesn’t feel like a massive high‑altitude mountaineering boot either.

On paper, Berghaus sells it as a waterproof, breathable all‑round hiking boot for autumn/winter. The key points are: Gore‑Tex membrane for waterproofing, memory foam around tongue and collar for comfort, and a Vibram/EVA sole for grip and cushioning. The pair weighs roughly 1 kg, so you feel them on your feet, but that’s normal for leather boots in this category.

Out of the box, they come laced up, no extras, no spare laces, no fancy packaging. Just the boots and a bit of cardboard. I cleaned them, then put on a couple of coats of wax before first use, which I’d strongly recommend if you want the leather to last and stay looking half decent. The leather arrives pre‑treated, but not heavily coated.

Overall presentation is pretty no‑nonsense: this is clearly built as a workhorse boot. No colourful panels, no big gimmicks. If you want something that looks like a trail runner, this isn’t it. If you want something that looks like a traditional hiking boot you can happily trash in mud and rain, that’s basically what you’re getting here.

Pros

  • Very good waterproofing in real wet, muddy conditions
  • Comfortable almost straight out of the box with decent support
  • Solid leather upper and grippy sole that handle rough terrain well

Cons

  • On the heavy and warm side compared to modern fabric boots
  • Inner lining can wear out faster with heavy daily use

Conclusion

Editor's rating

★★★★★ ★★★★★

The Berghaus Hillmaster II GTX is a solid, no‑nonsense leather hiking boot that does the basics well: it keeps your feet dry, gives good support, and grips nicely in wet, muddy conditions. Comfort out of the box is better than many leather boots I’ve tried, and the memory foam collar and tongue actually make a difference. If your reality is soggy fields, wet hills, and cold winter walks, these boots fit that use case pretty well.

They’re not perfect. They’re on the heavy side, they can feel warm on milder days, and the inner lining doesn’t seem as tough as the leather exterior. For heavy daily use, especially as work boots, you might see the lining wear faster than you’d like. But if you look after the leather with regular cleaning and waxing, the outer should last a good while, and the waterproofing is genuinely effective.

I’d recommend these to people who want a traditional leather hiking boot for autumn/winter, regular dog walking in rough fields, and UK hillwalking in mixed weather. They’re less suited to hikers who want something very light and breathable for fast summer hikes, or to those who are brutal on their gear and expect industrial‑level durability inside and out. For everyone else, they’re a pretty dependable choice that gets the job done without any fuss.

See offer Amazon

Sub-ratings

Value: fair price if you need real waterproof leather boots

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Design: traditional look, practical choices

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Comfort: good out of the box, but warm and a bit heavy

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Materials: leather, Gore‑Tex and a chunky sole

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Durability: tough outside, mixed feelings inside

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Performance on the trail: wet weather is where they shine

★★★★★ ★★★★★

What you actually get with the Hillmaster II GTX

★★★★★ ★★★★★
Hillmaster II Gtx, Men's High Rise Hiking Shoes 11 UK Coffee Brown
Berghaus
Hillmaster II Gtx, Men's High Rise Hiking Shoes 11 UK Coffee Brown
🔥
See offer Amazon